Molecular dynamic simulation studies of hemidesmus indicus-derived oleanen-3-yl acetate in stat3 based tumor signaling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69857/joapr.v12i5.670Keywords:
Hemidesmus indicus, GROMACS, PyRx, Oleanen 3yl acetate, Tumor inflammation, STAT3, NF-κBAbstract
Background: This study shows how oleanen-3-yl acetate, a plant substance found in Hemidesmus indicus, can be used as a medicine by looking at how it interacts with important signaling proteins in tumor inflammation. Methodology: Molecular docking and dynamics simulation analysis was carried out using PyRx and GROMACS to investigate the binding affinities and the interactions of oleanen-3-yl acetate with critical signaling protein receptors, including STAT3, NF-κB p105, and p53. Results: According to the docking studies, it has a strong binding energy of -8.1 kcal/mol for interacting with STAT3. This supports a strong downregulation of the STAT3-NF-κB signaling axis, a key factor in tumor inflammation. It sheds light on the conformational changes induced by Oleanen derivatives during binding, demonstrating its ability to destabilize the complex and enhance p53's apoptotic activity. Discussion: The RMSD values are maintained below at 2 Å throughout the simulation period, confirming the high structural stability of the ligand-protein complexes, while RMSF analysis is maintained at minimal fluctuation (<1.5 Å) involving key residues, supporting the best ligand-protein interactions. The fluctuations in root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) and root mean square deviation (RMSD) values further elucidate their involvement in the initiation of apoptosis in cancer cells. Conclusion: It shows an effective way to find new drugs and gives useful information for the future development of therapeutic agents based on Hemidesmus indicus in tumor inflammation. This research provides a robust technical foundation for further experimental validation and optimization in the drug development pipeline.
Downloads
References
Asma ST, Acaroz U, Imre K, Morar A, Shah SRA, Hussain SZ, Arslan-Acaroz D, Demirbas H, Hajrulai-Musliu Z, Istanbullugil FR, Soleimanzadeh A, Morozov D, Zhu K, Herman V, Ayad A, Athanassiou C, Ince S. Natural products/bioactive compounds as a source of anticancer drugs. Cancers (Basel), 14, 6203 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers.14246203.
Varadarajan PS, Roy A, Jagadeswaran D. Anticancer property of Digera muricata leaf extract: An in vitro study. Cureus, (2023) https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus49276.
Chang Y, Hawkins BA, Du JJ, Groundwater PW, Hibbs DE, Lai F. A guide to in silico drug design. Pharmaceutics, 15, 49 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15010049.
Singh N, Vayer P, Tanwar S, Poyet J-L, Tsaioun K, Villoutreix BO. Drug discovery and development: introduction to the general public and patient groups. Front. Drug Discov. (Lausanne), 3, (2023) https://doi.org/10.3389/fddsv.2023.1201419.
Patel K, Patel J, Patel M, Rajput G, Patel H. Introduction to hyphenated techniques and their applications in pharmacy. Pharm. Methods, 1, 2 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-4708.72222.
Hughes JP, Rees S, Kalindjian SB, Philpott KL. Principles of early drug discovery. Br. J. Pharmacol., 162, 1239–49 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01127.x
Agu PC, Afiukwa CA, Orji OU, Ezeh EM, Ofoke IH, Ogbu CO, Ugwuja EI, Aja PM. Molecular docking as a tool for the discovery of molecular targets of nutraceuticals in diseases management. Sci. Rep., 13, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40150-2.
Salo-Ahen OMH, Alanko I, Bhadane R, Bonvin AMJJ, Honorato RV, Hossain S, Juffer AH, Kabedev A, Lahtela-Kakkonen M, Larsen AS, Lescrinier E, Marimuthu P, Mirza MU, Mustafa G, Nunes-Alves A, Pantsar T, Saadabadi A, Singaravelu K, Vanmeert M. Molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery and pharmaceutical development. Processes (Basel), 9, 71 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010071.
Turrini E, Catanzaro E, Muraro MG, Governa V, Trella E, Mele V, Calcabrini C, Morroni F, Sita G, Hrelia P, Tacchini M, Fimognari C. Hemidesmus indicus induces immunogenic death in human colorectal cancer cells. Oncotarget, 9, 24443–56 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25325.
Aldughaylibi FS, Raza MA, Naeem S, Rafi H, Alam MW, Souayeh B, Farhan M, Aamir M, Zaidi N, Mir TA. Extraction of bioactive compounds for antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antidiabetic applications. Molecules, 27, 5935 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27185935.
Devi JR, Devi GN, Bavanilatha M, Gayathri G, Kowsalyaleela K, Anusha S, Durga M, Ramani R, Sabitha K. Pharmacophore based QSAR modelling of natural leads in antimicrobial drug design. Current Chinese Chemistry, 1, 80–4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2174/2666001601666200206102612.
Meng X-Y, Zhang H-X, Mezei M, Cui M. Molecular docking: A powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des., 7, 146–57 (2011) https://doi.org/10.2174/157340911795677602.
Vidhya Rekha U, Rajagopal P, Varadhachariyar R, Harie Priya P, Shazia Fathima JH, Govindan R, Palanisamy C, Aswini Brindha KB, Veeraraghavan VP, Jayaraman S. Molecular docking analysis of bioactive compounds from Cissampelos pareira with PPAR gamma. Bioinformation, 18, 265–8 (2022) https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630018265.
Dilipkumar, Karthik, Gowramma, Magesh, Kaviarasan. Synthesis, characterization, docking studies, and in-vitro cytotoxic activity of some novel 2, 3 disubstituted naphthalene 1,4 Dione derivatives. Curr. Bioact. Compd., 20, (2024) https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734072298465240403084903
Nautiyal M. Molecular docking analysis of Indole based diaza-sulphonamides with JAK-3 protein. Bioinformation, 19, 74–8 (2023) https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630019074.
Ramasubburayan R, Amperayani KR, Varadhi G, Dhanraj G, Athista M, Mahapatra S, Prakash S. Unraveling bioactive metabolites of mangroves as putative inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro and RBD proteins: molecular dynamics and ADMET analysis. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 1–10 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2023.2275185.
Mao Q, Feng M, Jiang XZ, Ren Y, Luo KH, van Duin ACT. Classical and reactive molecular dynamics: Principles and applications in combustion and energy systems. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 97, 101084 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101084.
Satish S. Molecular docking analysis of protein filamin-A with thioazo compounds. Bioinformation, 19, 99–104 (2023). https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630019099.
Das P, Mattaparthi VSK. Computational investigation on the p53–MDM2 interaction using the potential of mean force study. ACS Omega, 5, 8449–62 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03372.
Lobanov MI, Bogatyreva NS, Galzitskaia OV. Radius of gyration is indicator of compactness of protein structure. Mol. Biol. (Mosk.), 42, 701–6 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893308040195.
Krajka-Kuźniak V, Belka M, Papierska K. Targeting STAT3 and NF-κB signaling pathways in cancer prevention and treatment: The role of chalcones. Cancers (Basel), 16, 1092 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers.16061092.
Pandey B, Grover A, Sharma P. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed structural differences among WRKY domain-DNA interaction in barley (Hordeum vulgare). BMC Genomics, 19, (2018) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4506-3.
Carrà G, Lingua MF, Maffeo B, Taulli R, Morotti A. P53 vs NF-κB: the role of nuclear factor-kappa B in the regulation of p53 activity and vice versa. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 77, 4449–58 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03524-9.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 J Renukadevi , V S Karthikha, J Sam Helinto, D. Prena , Arockiya Rabin A
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.